Residents and industry clash at Santa Barbara hearing over oil-drilling ban

The county’s four‑hour public‑comment period on the proposed Phase 1 ordinance drew a broad cross section of perspectives, from students and environmental groups urging protection of health and climate, to industry representatives and mineral owners warning of takings claims and job loss.

Environmental groups and researchers emphasized health risks and emissions leakage tied to local production and idle wells. Sierra Club and UCSB researchers cited estimates that a phase‑out could avoid millions in health and climate damages. Students and youth groups delivered videos and in‑person comments urging the board to act for future generations.

Industry speakers and mineral owners countered that Santa Barbara production supports local jobs, charities and contractors. Several legal advocates and representatives for royalty owners warned the board of potential constitutional takings claims and urged delay until an amortization study and EIR evaluate impacts and compensation issues.

Speakers on both sides asked the board to address worker transition planning; multiple supervisors later emphasized that Phase 2 must study workforce and amortization strategies.

Direct quotes used in news coverage are attributed to speakers who self‑identified during the meeting. The board ultimately approved Phase 1 on a 3–2 vote.