Members debated whether Piper Shores should be considered a growth area because it already has sewer infrastructure. One member noted that existing sewer tends to make an area a candidate for growth, but several others argued conservation and neighborhood character suggest retaining residential or rural designations where possible.
Participants discussed placing small neighborhood centers — local shops or services — at strategically located intersections (Holmes & Roger, Broadturn) to reduce reliance on cars and support walkable amenities. A committee member recommended encouraging "small, small" amenities so neighborhoods do not become strictly car‑dependent.
The committee asked staff to record these local preferences and to weigh them against the vulnerability assessment and climate action plan before final recommendations are delivered to Council.