Board denies greenbelt rollback appeals for three 'Dancy' parcels over non-contiguity

Tax administrator Brad Neff described three greenbelt rollback appeals involving "Dancy" parcels and recommended denial because the parcels cross county lines and are not contiguous. "The recommendation is to deny the rollback," Neff said, explaining that statute requires contiguous parcels and these do not meet that test.

A board member asked whether the properties had been appealed in prior years; Neff confirmed there had been similarly named submissions in other years but did not confirm the prior-case details. Following discussion and a motion to approve staff's recommendation, the board voted unanimously to deny the requested greenbelt rollback for the three parcels.

Neff offered to answer follow-up questions about contiguity and the county's interpretation of the statute; none were brought forward on the record.