The commission voted to continue the application to replace 23 wood windows at 35 Pelham Street so applicants can provide a detailed, window‑by‑window expert assessment identifying which sashes and frames are repairable and which are irreparable.
Homeowner and resident testimony emphasized living‑condition problems: one resident described severe drafts and recurring water infiltration and requested replacements for quality‑of‑life reasons. “It's pathetic. I have to put up plastic,” a resident said about winter conditions and drafty openings. Preservation commissioners acknowledged the hardship but said the window survey on file did not clearly document which windows are beyond repair and asked for a follow‑up evaluation from a recognized window expert to identify repairs versus replacement needs, and to specify which openings, if any, require replacement.
The commission agreed to continue the item to the next scheduled meeting to permit the applicant to obtain clarified documentation and make per‑window recommendations.