A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Counsel spar over res judicata and 'invited error' defenses in appeal

September 11, 2026 | Other Court, Judicial , Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Counsel spar over res judicata and 'invited error' defenses in appeal
Respondent's attorney, Mark Lee, urged the court that res judicata and invited error affect the admissibility of some arguments on appeal. Lee said administrative proceedings and a dismissal with prejudice around related issues have procedural effect and that a sentence added near the end of the trial — which appellants relied on — can constitute invited error if not simultaneously challenged in the trial court.

Appellants' counsel Jeff Wykell replied that "invited error" typically concerns evidentiary objections and that the court should focus on whether the substantive law was misapplied. Wykell also argued that the administrative citation respondents relied on lacks factual statements showing a change in quantity of flow. The panel questioned both sides on whether prior administrative or court steps gave each party a full opportunity to litigate the specific factual issue now raised on appeal.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee