During the old-business presentation residents pressed the presenter on the safety of powder magazines and the potential for blasting to damage foundations or create pollution. The presenter, drawing on industry practice, said storage and accounting of explosive material is tightly controlled under MSHA (and mentioned ATF proximity rules) and described inventory and supervision practices intended to limit risk. "It's inventoried very often and it's a federal offense if you miscount," the presenter said in response to safety concerns.
Those technical assurances did not resolve broader community concerns about compatibility with the town's master plan and tourism-driven vision. Several residents and a local business owner said industrial activity could undermine Schofield's character; the presenter countered that the project could contribute county royalty revenue he estimated at "3 or $400,000 a year" and provide a multi-year transition for the town. Commissioners said pollution and noise issues fall under EPA and other regulatory reviews and that planning & zoning will focus on whether the plan fits local zoning rules, then pass technical matters to the appropriate agencies.