Council heard an extended presentation on employee health insurance renewal options, including a high-deductible plan that would permit Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), an HMO alternative to the current PPO, and a partial self-funding arrangement (HRA).
The benefits presenter summarized the current plan and alternatives, saying, “The plan on the right is what we call a health savings account, compliant or a qualified high deductible health plan.” He described the existing plan as a traditional plan with a $1,500 individual deductible and $3,000 family deductible, and noted the city’s current contribution amounts for the family and single policies. The presenter said the HSA-qualified option could lower premiums (he cited roughly a 32.7% premium reduction in one example) but would raise out-of-pocket responsibility because employees would pay up to higher deductibles before plan coverage fully applies.
Council members asked how many employees were enrolled (the Chair and presenter identified 28 families and several single enrollments) and whether offering an HSA option would change the group’s network or participation; staff said it would be offered as an additional option and would not change the employer’s overall group status with the carrier. Members discussed ways the city could address employee exposure to higher deductibles, such as contributing the premium difference into employee HSAs.
The presenter also described a partial self-funding HRA option that would keep employee-facing coverage similar while the city reimburses deductibles through a third-party administrator; that design can reduce premiums but requires the city to take on some risk and administrative oversight. Council asked for follow-up information and said staff should return with more detailed cost scenarios and enrollment impacts before adopting changes.
Council did not take immediate action; members asked staff to return with numbers and to meet individually with affected employees as needed.