Commissioner Miss Brandes moved a conditional change to FTOW eligibility on Robbery 2 and the commission voted to approve the narrower language that would allow certain Robbery 2 convictions to be eligible for first-time offender waiver when there was no use or threatened use of a firearm or weapon, the case was not reduced from Robbery 1 by prosecutors, and bodily injury did not exceed misdemeanor-assault levels.
Miss Brandes said many jurisdictions already recognize lower-severity Robbery 2 conduct appropriate for alternatives and proposed language to avoid allowing plea reductions from Robbery 1 to create eligibility that would undercut victim protections: "By doing so, the legislature was signaling that there is conduct that gets scooped into the robbery 2 arena that is more appropriate for alternatives than others," she said (Miss Brandes, SEG 1300–1310). Judge Ferrer agreed such limits and careful wording are important to prevent plea practice from circumventing the intent of the exclusion, and other judges raised concerns about perceived weapons and victim trauma (Judge Ferreira, SEG 1390–1398; Dr. Krumens, SEG 1438–1446).
After discussion and a motion that included the phrase "does not include use or threatened use of a firearm or weapon" and that the offense was not reduced by prosecutors from Robbery 1, the body voted. The chair announced the motion carried with 10 in favor, 4 opposed and 6 abstentions/proxies recorded (SEG 1775–1785). Staff will incorporate the conditional language in the report and clarify plea-related language for legislative readers.
The commission emphasized the intent to capture lower-severity incidents (for example, non-injurious shoplifting escalations) while excluding situations involving real or threatened firearms or serious injury.