A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Neighbors urge in‑depth review of proposed Maple/Park estate after applicants propose 40‑car underground garage

September 06, 2026 | Town of Greenwich, Fairfield, Connecticut


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Neighbors urge in‑depth review of proposed Maple/Park estate after applicants propose 40‑car underground garage
An applicant team presented a pre‑application to consolidate four adjacent parcels into a single estate and build a substantial new residence with a guest house, indoor padel court, indoor pool, and an extensive below‑grade garage. The plan prompted extensive neighborhood pushback.

Tom Hegney described the intent: the project would unify 59, 63 and 75 Maple Avenue and 8 Park Avenue into a single estate with new circulation and consolidated parking. “My client's looking to construct their home…to provide for their art and a car collection,” Hegney said. But neighbors and commissioners pressed for detailed technical review before the project advances. Speakers asked for an independent drainage analysis (the town’s zero‑net increase standard), a traffic and construction management study (given an estimated multi‑year program and many truck trips), and an objective neighborhood scale/context comparison that includes below‑grade volume.

Residents emphasized flood and storm concerns, the long duration and safety impacts of rock removal or blasting, and questioned whether a large underground car gallery (tens of thousands of square feet) is truly accessory to a single‑family residence. “This is the car collection and display facility on a scale more typical of a private museum than a household,” said neighbor Ian Burke. The commission instructed the applicant to return with drainage, traffic and construction logistics studies, a clear explanation of legal rights for shared driveways, and a comparative context study to show how the proposed scale fits local zoning standards and section 6‑17 special‑permit tests.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee