Representative Case focused questioning on IBAS funding levels and the department's contingency planning if mandatory funds do not materialize. At the hearing he recited recent appropriations history and the FY27 request: "the fiscal year 27 IBAS request is about 2,750,000,000, of which 2.58 mandatory" (transcript remarks quoted by a committee member).
The assistant secretary responded that budget allocation decisions were negotiated above his office and that his team would deprioritize other sectors in the IBAS portfolio to maintain workforce programs, including Build Freedom, at current levels if the requested mandatory funding were not enacted. He committed to building a future-years defense program plan for the workforce portfolio and briefing the committee on that plan.
Members raised concerns that relying on mandatory funding risks discontinuity if the larger reconciliation package or other enabling legislation does not pass; committee members asked for clearer transition plans for successful pilot projects to local sponsors or service budgets when federal seed funding ends.