A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Residents cite reporting on 'Flock' ALPR cameras and call for scrutiny of data-retention practices

August 31, 2026 | San Diego City, San Diego County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents cite reporting on 'Flock' ALPR cameras and call for scrutiny of data-retention practices
Public commenters raised privacy concerns about automated license-plate reader (ALPR) systems—referred to in testimony as Flock—and urged council review of data-sharing and retention practices following local reporting. Tony (Anthony Ralphs) referenced front-page reporting by the San Diego Union-Tribune and warned the council of privacy risks and extended retention policies in the region.

“I wanted to put a spotlight on the fantastic reporting ... It highlights all of the dangers associated with flock,” he said, noting that some jurisdictions retain ALPR data longer than the 30-day norm and that Coronado reportedly keeps it for 365 days. Commenters asked council to consider the article's findings and potential policy responses to data retention and sharing practices.

City staff did not announce a policy change during the meeting; council members and staff listened to the concerns during the public-comment period and no action was taken on the matter at the session.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee