During public comment, a Jackson Township representative disputed an earlier characterization that outside mutual‑aid agreements guarantee ALS responses and said he had documentation from Harrison County showing no ALS guarantee.
"He sent me that agreement, and nowhere in there does it say that they will provide you an ALS ambulance... He simply... And said that he cannot guarantee sending you an... A paramedic ALS in Ambulance, so no way would he agree to that because it's not guaranteed," the commenter said, presenting his claim to the board. The commenter asked that any offer of assistance be put in writing.
The same commenter also made an emphatic offer of help: "At the end of the day, your ordinance... when it comes to patient care means nothing. If somebody needs to get to the hospital, there's not an ambulance coming, and I have that ability, they can be... I'm willing to violate your ordinance, and I will transport." Board leadership and staff agreed that mutual aid is preferred but emphasized it is not a guaranteed solution.
Why it matters: the dispute clarifies limits on mutual aid and may affect how the county plans coverage, particularly whether it relies on formal written agreements or pursues local capital investment, such as an additional ambulance.