Andrew H. White, a neighboring property owner, told the Board of Adjustment he received additional records the morning of the meeting and identified inconsistencies among plan sheets and elevations in the packet published for the hearing. White said one sheet lists a 28‑foot ridge height while another, with the same plan number, lists 25 feet 2 inches; finished‑floor elevations also differed among documents.
White asked the board to continue the hearing and require one coordinated plan set that reconciles elevations and ridge heights so the public can meaningfully review the actual request. "If the board is unwilling to continue the matter, we respectfully ask that it deny the application presently submitted because the request cannot be verified from the conflicting record," White said. The board voted to continue the case and requested reconciled plans from the applicant.