Commissioners questioned how Amendment 3 could affect the Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) fund and planned debt service tied to redevelopment projects. One commissioner noted a $7 million line of credit tied to demolition and marina reworking and asked whether Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenue would still cover those payments if property‑tax collections decline.
Ms. Campbell said the CRA’s revenue is heavily property‑tax dependent and that the TIF fund receives both city and county increments. She explained the CRA must spend on items listed in the CRA master plan and that the most likely TIF impact would come from the lowered cap on non‑homesteaded property valuation growth. "Unless, and this is a big asterisk, if the county decides that they could no longer afford to participate in a TIF funded program and they decide to end the plan, then then all of the projects and debt associated with that would rule to the general fund of obligations," Ms. Campbell said. Staff said they would review interlocal agreements and statute to clarify whether the county could unilaterally end participation.