Milton DRB approves 2-lot subdivision at 3 & 19 Precast Road with conditions
August 27, 2026 | Milton, Chittenden County, Vermont
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The Milton Development Review Board on Aug. 27 approved a Final Plan Review allowing Camp Holdings, LLC to split a 5.02-acre property at 3 and 19 Precast Road into two separate lots for existing commercial buildings in the town’s General Industrial (I2) zoning district.
Colen Johnson and Eric Licho, engineers with Bowman Engineering, attended on behalf of the applicant. The board read a set of conditions the applicant must meet before the final plat may be recorded, and Chair Bruce Jenkins administered the oath at the start of the hearing.
The board identified a set of requirements to be satisfied prior to recording, including conformity with signage rules (section 3015), installation of monuments and lot corner markers per section 3405.K, and submission of any applicable state permits. The board also asked staff to determine whether street lighting and pedestrian or bicycle facilities are required for the project.
The board recorded a formal legal-escrow requirement: the applicant must submit $500 to cover Town Attorney review of deeds and related legal instruments; any unspent funds will be refunded to the applicant. The board cited 24 V.S.A. §4463(b) in explaining that the applicant must file a final subdivision plat within 180 days of final approval and that the plat must be deemed Final by planning staff before recording.
"Motion to approve the application, with conditions of approval as presented," moved Mary Callahan and seconded by Bill McSweeney; the motion was approved unanimously at 6:08 p.m. The hearing was closed and the board said it will issue a Notice of Decision within 45 days.
The decision includes administrative steps the applicant must complete before receiving a zoning permit or recording the final survey plat, including submission of full-size and reduced plan sets, electronic PDF plans for staff review, and draft deeds for Town Attorney review. The board noted it may schedule a site visit and that any omission or misstatement of material fact could be grounds for revocation of approval.
The board’s action does not itself authorize any construction; staff must confirm final plan status and required permits before any permits are issued or work begins.
Colen Johnson and Eric Licho, engineers with Bowman Engineering, attended on behalf of the applicant. The board read a set of conditions the applicant must meet before the final plat may be recorded, and Chair Bruce Jenkins administered the oath at the start of the hearing.
The board identified a set of requirements to be satisfied prior to recording, including conformity with signage rules (section 3015), installation of monuments and lot corner markers per section 3405.K, and submission of any applicable state permits. The board also asked staff to determine whether street lighting and pedestrian or bicycle facilities are required for the project.
The board recorded a formal legal-escrow requirement: the applicant must submit $500 to cover Town Attorney review of deeds and related legal instruments; any unspent funds will be refunded to the applicant. The board cited 24 V.S.A. §4463(b) in explaining that the applicant must file a final subdivision plat within 180 days of final approval and that the plat must be deemed Final by planning staff before recording.
"Motion to approve the application, with conditions of approval as presented," moved Mary Callahan and seconded by Bill McSweeney; the motion was approved unanimously at 6:08 p.m. The hearing was closed and the board said it will issue a Notice of Decision within 45 days.
The decision includes administrative steps the applicant must complete before receiving a zoning permit or recording the final survey plat, including submission of full-size and reduced plan sets, electronic PDF plans for staff review, and draft deeds for Town Attorney review. The board noted it may schedule a site visit and that any omission or misstatement of material fact could be grounds for revocation of approval.
The board’s action does not itself authorize any construction; staff must confirm final plan status and required permits before any permits are issued or work begins.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
✓
Permanent access to expanding government content
30-day money-back guarantee
