City staff and council members discussed the limited asset-forfeiture receipts so far and whether those or other funds could support public-safety initiatives, including the potential addition of a K-9 unit under MOUs with the sheriff s office.
"We haven't done any yet. However, again, we just just signed up on an online security program," staff said when describing early stages of asset-forfeiture and forfeiture-related program planning. (Staff member, S3)
A council member asked for $100,000 for a program but said a measurable goal must be specified to justify the allocation. "All I'm asking is the $100,000. If we're going to justify that, I think we need a measurable goal to support it," the council member said. (Council member, S1)
Other council members said the city should not rely on asset forfeiture alone because receipts are uncertain and that MOUs and interagency agreements are still being negotiated. Staff and council members agreed on the need for clearer metrics and a defined performance target before committing the funds.