A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Sen. Adegin's SB 632 would allow part‑time community college students to qualify for College Promise waivers; committee approves on split vote

August 26, 2026 | Senate, Legislative, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Sen. Adegin's SB 632 would allow part‑time community college students to qualify for College Promise waivers; committee approves on split vote
Senator Adegin presented SB 632, which would make part‑time community college students (for example, those enrolled in nine units) eligible for the California College Promise tuition waiver. Adegin said the current 12‑unit requirement excludes many low‑income students who attend part time because of work or caregiving responsibilities.

"The current criteria for the California College Promise grama leaves a significant majority of community college students ineligible for the current tuition fee waiver," Adegin said, arguing the bill would expand access and allow local districts to waive part or all fees for eligible part‑time students.

Mark McDonald (Los Angeles College Faculty Guild) and Tiffany Mok (California Federation of Teachers) testified in support, noting that many community college students attend part time and that fee waivers targeted at 6–9 units could incentivize increased enrollment in 9 units.

Senator Cabaldon spoke in opposition, stressing that the College Promise was designed to nudge students toward 12 units and that completion rates correlate with full‑time enrollment: "I remain opposed to the to this bill... the full time nature of the of that promise is an essential design element." Committee members and the author agreed monitoring completion rates would be important if the bill becomes law.

A motion to concur in assembly amendments passed on roll call with five yes votes and two no votes (Ochoa Bog and Cabaldon opposed). Clerks recorded the bill as moving out of committee with a 5–2 tally.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee