ZBA reconsiders ordinance section, applies LUO 403 instead of LUO 202
July 29, 2026 | Washington, Sullivan County, New Hampshire
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The ZBA's record explains members initially considered the applicant's request under LUO 202 (a 30-foot sideline setback) and noted that as a commercial building the minimum allowed setback might be 50 feet. At the July 29, 2026 meeting the board reconsidered and unanimously agreed that LUO 403, not LUO 202, should govern the matter—leading the notice to cite LUO 403.1 in the granted variance.
The record shows the board's change in interpretation was part of its deliberation and was recorded in the Findings of Fact; the notice does not include the vote tally for the procedural determination but records unanimous agreement on the applicable section.
The record shows the board's change in interpretation was part of its deliberation and was recorded in the Findings of Fact; the notice does not include the vote tally for the procedural determination but records unanimous agreement on the applicable section.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
