Council members extensively questioned staff about the number, distribution and necessity of proposed staffing additions in the FY2027 budget. Staff reported 52 requested positions across all funds, of which 32 were proposed in the general fund with 14 of those in public safety; separate airport-related hires and facility/IT positions account for some additional requests.
Mark Holloway said the rough estimated annual cost for about 31 additional non-public-safety FTEs would be approximately $3,000,000, including salary and benefits. Councilman Lynch pushed staff to analyze service impacts if selected positions were not funded, saying he opposed rate increases and wanted to test options that would slow operating budget growth. "I'm gonna be opposed to any rate increase and very concerned about any growth in the operating budget year over year," Lynch said on the record.
Staff described rigorous internal scrubbing of supplemental requests and said positions were spread across departments and funds, not concentrated in one area. Council members asked staff to return with an analysis showing what service reductions or delays would result if certain FTE requests were deferred or denied, as well as which roles could be repurposed or paid from other funding sources such as MCDC or TIRs.