County staff proposed a 5% across-the-board salary and benefits increase in the draft budget. The finance presenter noted that the expenditure estimate includes the 5% increase and said that with that increase the county would still have an ending fund balance above policy minimums.
One commissioner asked the court, "So, are y'all in agreement with the 5% which is as opposed to the 6%?" and other members expressed differing views: some supported 5% as prudent given overall finances and recent surplus performance, while another commissioner asked that his individual budget requests for 6% be considered "for the work and volume" in that office. The discussion referenced recent insurance price increases (one commissioner noted double-digit insurance increases elsewhere) and operational challenges such as unfilled positions in the jail that temporarily lower expenditures.
The court did not take a formal vote at the workshop; commissioners asked staff to keep both scenarios in the packet so the court could finalize the percentage at the next scheduled meeting.