A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Applicant witness cites PJM capacity shortfall as a signal of need; cautions it is not dispositive

August 06, 2026 | Public Service Commission, Organizations, Executive, Maryland


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Applicant witness cites PJM capacity shortfall as a signal of need; cautions it is not dispositive
During cross-examination, counsel read aloud Scofield's rebuttal discussion of PJM auction results for the 2029 delivery year, noting an uncovered UCAP shortage figure. The counsel asked whether Scofield agreed PJM had a filing with FERC proposing a reliability backstop procurement to address the same quantity. Scofield said he was aware of the filing and characterized the backstop as "first of its kind" with unknown results.

When asked whether the PJM shortfall alone proved the prices in this proceeding should be approved, Scofield said it did not in itself prove that, but that it is a useful signal about PJM supply and demand balance. The exchange highlighted how applicant witnesses used regional capacity indicators to frame the urgency of new capacity while acknowledging other processes (such as PJM’s filing) are underway and carry their own uncertainty.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee