City planner: proposed recovery residence raises use‑variance and Fair Housing Act questions

City planner Wade Burkholder told the Lapeer Zoning Board of Appeals the application filed April 27, 2026, sought permission to operate a recovery residence accommodating up to 12 unrelated adults in an R‑2 single‑family residential zone and that the request "does constitute a request for a use variance." Burkholder repeated that staff could not grant reasonable accommodations under federal law and framed the board's task as reviewing whether the zoning administrator's denial was arbitrary or capricious.

Burkholder also walked the board through the city's table of uses and said several human‑care and transitional housing types are treated as special land uses in multi‑family or business districts rather than in R‑2. He told the board that the applicants described the proposed operation as non‑permanent (average stay 6–12 months) and that no on‑site clinical services were proposed. Board members asked staff to confirm which materials and communications were included in the record before the board could resolve whether the planner's interpretation was correct.