Trustees debate scope and process of proposed cybersecurity policy, then table first reading

A lengthy discussion of a proposed cybersecurity policy exposed differing views about board governance, policy scope and staff responsibilities. Board member Blaia said district gaps warranted a robust cybersecurity policy; other members raised questions about process and whether technical operational details belong in administrative regulations rather than board policy.

General Counsel and staff advised the board that policy authority rests with trustees but that clarity is needed about delegation to the superintendent and staff. Given those concerns, a motion to table the first reading was made and seconded; the board agreed to defer the item to the retreat and follow‑up sessions so staff and counsel can refine policy language and split operational specifics into ARs where appropriate.