Residents tell council 90‑day notice is too short; call for more time and options

A steady stream of residents used the meeting's public-comment period to press the council for more time and more information before choosing a long-term fire-service path.

"We need more time," one resident said after describing the short notice, and Lucy Cirello told councilors, "this is a money grab," a characterization county officials disputed. Other speakers urged the council to continue pursuing mutual or automatic aid updates with neighboring agencies and to investigate grants and phased hiring as alternatives to an abrupt change.

Speakers with longtime local experience described the difficulty of recruiting volunteer firefighters in the modern era and noted the city had already been working toward more full-time coverage before the county actions accelerated the timeline. Several commenters argued the council should update or renegotiate mutual-aid contracts with other nearby departments as an intermediate step.

Why it matters: public sentiment may shape the council's political calculus; many speakers said they would prefer a slower, locally controlled transition rather than immediate transfer of taxing and operational authority to the county fire district.

What councilors said in response: city and county officials said they would continue to discuss mutual-aid extensions and that the county had already proposed a mutual-aid alternative while stressing that safety concerns motivated the county's actions.