Commissioners used the sheriff's budget presentation to press for transparency about the county's use of vendor-provided license-plate readers. When Commissioner McCann asked whether the FY27 budget included funds for "flock cameras," Sheriff Wells said annual service charges are included and that he would provide the exact number to the board.
"This budget here, we may have some flock camera, yearly services," the sheriff said, adding that he would "get that number for you." He described LPR data handling as audited and said data is "dumped every month" and that officers must have a case number and a law-enforcement purpose to view tag information. "We use it strictly for a crime fighting tool," he said, and later reported, "in the last 2 years, we've, arrested a 137, felons from flock."
Commissioners pressed for public disclosure of safeguards and how the vendor stores and shares data. Chair and others said vendor internal safeguards and transparency are central to privacy concerns, and that the company should be prepared to defend its practices. Commissioner McCann asked for publication of what protections exist "so the public needs to read it as well as hear it." Staff agreed to provide details on what expenditures in the budget cover and to follow up with line-item information.
The board did not adopt any new policy on LPR use at the meeting; commissioners asked staff to return with more detailed figures and privacy safeguards in the proposed budget publication.