Subcommittee examines new suspension, expulsion and readmission language, sparking concerns about rehabilitation and equity
April 25, 2026 | Acton-Agua Dulce Unified, School Districts, California
This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »
The HR director summarized Regulation 5.1.4.4.1 on suspension, expulsion and due process, noting the district last updated its language in April 2025 and the CSBA-recommended language adds specific procedural safeguards and rehabilitation planning.
The HR director said the updated language requires that "No student may be disciplined prior to finding being made pursuant to the grievance process established by 34 CFR 106.45," referencing federal grievance requirements for discrimination and harassment complaints. The regulation also calls for a tailored rehabilitation plan developed in consultation with district staff and community resources, periodic review of that plan, and a preliminary assessment for readmission at least 45 days before the end of an expulsion term.
Board members expressed serious concerns. Sam Black warned the nondiscipline removal and rehabilitation provisions could be used to push students out and that charging parents for services the board deems necessary could create inequities. Black said the package "creates a world of contention" and called for clearer language and stronger preventative supports such as counseling and mental-health services.
Members also highlighted contradictory readmission language: while the plan "shall not be a basis to deny readmission" if not completed because of transportation or financial barriers, other sections allow denial when a student has not substantially satisfied rehabilitation conditions despite having access to viable opportunities; HR director acknowledged the apparent contradiction and said staff would review the drafting.
No formal votes or expulsions were taken; the committee requested clarifying edits and additional implementation detail.
The HR director said the updated language requires that "No student may be disciplined prior to finding being made pursuant to the grievance process established by 34 CFR 106.45," referencing federal grievance requirements for discrimination and harassment complaints. The regulation also calls for a tailored rehabilitation plan developed in consultation with district staff and community resources, periodic review of that plan, and a preliminary assessment for readmission at least 45 days before the end of an expulsion term.
Board members expressed serious concerns. Sam Black warned the nondiscipline removal and rehabilitation provisions could be used to push students out and that charging parents for services the board deems necessary could create inequities. Black said the package "creates a world of contention" and called for clearer language and stronger preventative supports such as counseling and mental-health services.
Members also highlighted contradictory readmission language: while the plan "shall not be a basis to deny readmission" if not completed because of transportation or financial barriers, other sections allow denial when a student has not substantially satisfied rehabilitation conditions despite having access to viable opportunities; HR director acknowledged the apparent contradiction and said staff would review the drafting.
No formal votes or expulsions were taken; the committee requested clarifying edits and additional implementation detail.
Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!
Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.
✓
Get instant access to full meeting videos
✓
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
✓
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
✓
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
30-day money-back guarantee
