A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Paramount poll finds strong support for commercial and industrial parcel tax; staff details how $4M would be spent

July 30, 2026 | Paramount, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Paramount poll finds strong support for commercial and industrial parcel tax; staff details how $4M would be spent
A consultant hired by the city told the Paramount City Council on July 28 that a likely-voter poll shows broad support for a proposed parcel tax on commercial and industrial properties. Dr. Richard Bernard of FM3 said, “On the initial vote, 76% said yes, 21% said no, 3% were undecided,” based on a dual-mode survey of 216 likely voters conducted June 18–July 9.

City staff framed the measure as a targeted, non-residential levy designed to close a multi-year budget gap. Finance Director Lana Deach said the city is facing near-term pressure: “For fiscal year 26–27, the general fund is projecting to receive 48,800,000 and expected to spend 49.4 millions. That created the budget gap of $545,000,” and noted a 10-year projected cumulative deficit of about $27.7 million if no corrective action is taken.

Assistant City Manager Grisel Chavez described how the measure’s projected $4,000,000 in recurring revenue would be allocated. “There’s four key areas where the $4,000,000 would be invested, and that includes our roads infrastructure at a cost of $2,000,000 a year, our public safety services at $1,500,000 a year, environmental and other essential services at $250,000 a year, and $250,000 for economic development,” Chavez said. Staff said the parcel tax would be levied by square foot (proposed 8¢ commercial, 11¢ industrial, 13¢ for vacant commercial/industrial) and phased in over three years (65% year 1, 80% year 2, 100% year 3) with an independent oversight committee and audits.

Staff and the pollster both emphasized that neutral education and outreach could increase definite support; Dr. Bernard noted that simulating education in the survey raised “definitely yes” responses substantially. Council members asked about sample size and how undecided voters were handled; Bernard explained the study targeted likely voters and that multiple FM3 city-level surveys combined would yield a larger effective sample.

If placed on the ballot, staff said the city could bond anticipated revenues to frontload approximately $30 million for accelerated road repairs over five years, with the first parcel-tax receipts expected in spring 2028 after a phase-in. The City Manager also noted that county election consolidation deadlines and fees apply if the council proceeds.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee