A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Committee recommends NeoGov HRIS and payroll build‑out after vendors pledge extended implementation and support

December 31, 2025 | Elko County , Nevada


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee recommends NeoGov HRIS and payroll build‑out after vendors pledge extended implementation and support
The Oakland County Budget Committee voted Dec. 31 to recommend that the full commission consider a capital expenditure to extend the county's NeoGov software to include HRIS and payroll modules. Amanda Osborne gave the presentation and described recurring errors with the county’s current Central Square payroll and HR processes that have required manual audits and retroactive corrections.

Osborne said the proposed first‑year implementation funding is $136,004.57 and that ongoing maintenance would later be funded from operations; she also said the county currently pays roughly $200,000 a year in maintenance for related services. "This has to work," Osborne said, describing problems with payroll calculations, PERS reporting and the inability to process retro pay automatically for roughly 420 employees. Committee members pressed for assurances the vendor would provide implementation support and fixes.

NeoGov representative Alan Paul told the committee the company lengthened the planned implementation to a full year to allow parallel payroll runs and additional services to reduce risk. "We're actually gonna take the whole year," Paul said, explaining the vendor intends to run both systems in parallel until the county is confident the payroll and reporting functions are correct. Paul also said NeoGov provides code‑free reporting tools and that the contract includes performance language and provisions for support.

Committee members said on‑site training and hands‑on support during the go‑live phase were essential. A member asked about training and whether reports could be produced without technical SQL skills; Paul said the system’s reports are designed to be used without programming. The committee moved and seconded a recommendation to forward the proposal to the full commission; the committee voted in favor.

Next steps: the proposal will be placed on the full commission agenda for consideration and formal approval.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee