A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board reaffirms building‑department cease‑and‑desist for home‑based retail at 1022 Park Ave.

July 24, 2026 | Chesterton, Porter County, Indiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board reaffirms building‑department cease‑and‑desist for home‑based retail at 1022 Park Ave.
The Chesterton Board of Zoning Appeals on July 23 reaffirmed a building department cease‑and‑desist order against a resident operating regular pallet/liquidation sales from a home at 1022 Park Ave (business referenced as K and J Wholesale Liquidation).

Building‑department staff said a complaint and a review of the petitioner’s Facebook posts showed repeated advertising, the listing of the home address on a business page and posts (including July 19) announcing sales at that address. The petitioner (who identified herself in the meeting as a homeowner and said she had an EIN and had registered with the state) said she believed she had followed prior guidance and that early discussions with town staff had indicated occasional yard sales were allowed. She said she had held sales in June and, later, had advertised pickups in Chesterton.

Board counsel and members reviewed procedural options and found the evidence supported the building department’s view that the activity had crossed from occasional yard sales into an ongoing retail operation that requires appropriate licensing. The board voted to waive the $50 filing fee for the appeal and to reaffirm the building‑department cease‑and‑desist. Counsel advised petitioners to file complete materials if they intend to pursue an administrative appeal or a use‑variance application; staff offered to meet with the petitioners to explain compliance paths.

"We sent the cease and desist," a staff member said, noting the Facebook posts that listed sales and the home address. The board suggested alternatives such as seeking a market stall or storefront if the petitioner wishes to continue retail operations.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee