A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission prefers supplemental materials over embedding many examples in Land Use section

November 22, 2025 | Sharon, Windsor County, Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission prefers supplemental materials over embedding many examples in Land Use section
Chair John Roe distributed a new draft of the Land Use section on Nov. 22, incorporating notes Sue Sellew had provided before the meeting. Commissioners discussed the pros and cons of embedding specific examples directly in the Regulations versus keeping the Regulations concise and publishing broader examples in separate supplemental materials for public readability.

John Roe, Alexandra Babicki and Lucy Gibson said supplemental materials would make a wider range of examples more accessible to the public while preserving the Regulations’ concise formal language. Andrew Cliburn offered to redraft parts of the section based on the discussion and his background understanding.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee