Fred, who discussed the county's grant follow‑up with Springfield, told the committee the county's prior hazard mitigation application was for $520,000 with a county match of $130,000. "The grant application that went in was for $520,000, and the county would be responsible for a 130,000 of that because it is a match grant," Fred said, describing the funding breakdown and the state's timeline for award notifications.
Committee members debated procurement strategy because ordering or beginning project work could jeopardize grant reimbursement. Fred and other staff said the county can advertise for bids but should not open them until the state award is confirmed; he suggested a 90‑day let period. One member pushed to go out for bids immediately given long generator lead times and said the county already knows the generator size and needs to secure lead time. Kurt (staff) advised that the electrical engineer prepare bid specifications and contact manufacturers about current lead times; he recommended stipulating price‑hold periods in bid documents. The committee agreed to have the engineer appear at an upcoming August meeting to answer technical questions and to prepare bid documents while withholding bid openings pending grant clarity.