Committee members debated whether to permit limited, transparent exceptions — such as a small number of discretionary slots for teachers' children — to support staff recruitment and retention.
One member strongly objected to the idea, framing it as an improper negotiated benefit and a risk to public trust: "This is just wrong on every level I can think of," the member said, arguing that such benefits should be bargained by the union, not granted ad hoc by the board. Other members proposed a narrowly constrained superintendent-level discretion with board notification for truly exceptional cases, provided the practice is transparent.
The committee did not adopt a final position but directed staff to draft optional language that would allow limited, documented exceptions under superintendent authority with a required report to the board so decisions are visible and auditable.