During line-by-line review, committee members repeatedly emphasized the need for precise definitions for e-bikes, e-scooters, e-skateboards and similar devices and discussed registration or sticker programs tied to education.
"We need to define what ebike is," a committee member said, and proposed that a registration could "come with some type of course or paperwork" so riders and parents understand local expectations. Members noted the draft currently lacks a clear scooter definition and suggested referencing state definitions where possible.
The group also discussed ADA exceptions for mobility devices and how field enforcement could be complicated if devices are split into multiple speed classes that are visually indistinguishable. Several members recommended keeping the ordinance flexible for people with mobility needs while ensuring the rules are enforceable and accompanied by public education rather than relying solely on fines.
Committee members asked staff and legal counsel to tighten definitions, check state statute language, and return a revised draft prior to council first reading.