Charlie Zack, the commission’s legal advisor, opened the meeting and framed the commission’s role, saying, “My name is Charlie Zack. I’m with the law firm of Dent Navarro and Company.” He told members he has worked on charters across Texas and will assist with drafting and redlining any proposed language the commission approves.
Zack gave a primer on Texas municipal structures, explaining the difference between general-law and home-rule cities and the practical consequences for what belongs in a charter. He reminded the commission that proposed charter amendments must ultimately flow through city council and be submitted to voters, and that the commission itself is subject to the Texas Open Meetings Act. “The Charter Commission shall inquire into the operation of city government and review the charter to determine whether it requires revision,” he told members, summarizing the commission’s statutory responsibilities. The commission heard that amendments should be legally consistent, administratively feasible, fiscally reasonable and durable over time.