A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council reviews draft ordinance to regulate smoke and vape shops, including age limits and licensing cap

July 13, 2026 | Washington, Tazewell County, Illinois


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council reviews draft ordinance to regulate smoke and vape shops, including age limits and licensing cap
City staff presented a draft ordinance amending city code to regulate smoke and vape shops, defining electronic cigarettes and establishing purchase-age rules, licensing, and penalties. The proposal would set an age threshold moving purchases toward 21 with a carve‑out allowing possession at 18 in one’s private residence or with a parent or legal guardian. The ordinance would require annual licensing fees ($250 for a business defined as a smoke shop; $100 for other tobacco sellers), fines in the $75–$100 range for violations, and a local cap of four licensed smoke/vape shops under the city’s definition.

Council members asked staff how the ordinance would be enforced and appealed. Staff said proof of sales is expected to document the percentage of tobacco-related revenue where that threshold is part of the licensing test; square‑footage tests would be administratively verified and any license suspension or revocation would follow an administrative hearing process with the option to seek circuit‑court review. Chief Stevens clarified that state‑licensed cannabis dispensaries are exempt from the local smoke‑shop licensing because they are licensed through the state.

Several alderpersons voiced support for the proposed controls while asking for clarifications on measurement and appeals. One councilmember said the cap of four roughly matches the current local count and noted the ordinance is modeled in part on liquor‑license limits that require council approval to add more licenses. Staff said they would incorporate council feedback and return the ordinance for a first reading at the next council meeting.

Context and next steps: Council did not vote on the ordinance at the committee meeting; staff was seeking guidance and intends to bring the ordinance back for first reading and formal action.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee