Terry Stewart, a Richland resident, urged the Planning Commission to add visible policies for large-scale data centers during the public-comment period. "Atlas Agro PGF and data set facilities are requesting transmission of 1,300 megawatts, which is 13 times what Richland uses right now," Stewart said, and called for three principles: prioritize residents and existing businesses for power and water, protect natural resources, and require operational transparency and monitoring.
Staff told the commission the comprehensive plan discussion is an appropriate place to raise those issues but said performance standards for large uses typically live in the development code. Director Rosatello noted that the subject would be covered in code updates (Titles 23 and 24) and that staff will provide Stewart's materials to the comp‑plan consultant. "That is essentially where that would live," Rosatello said, explaining the staff is beginning early edits to the development code.
The exchange did not produce an immediate policy change. Commission discussion later in the meeting returned to how development agreements and code provisions could be used to impose mitigation or monitoring conditions on large or long‑lived projects.