A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Commission weighs alternatives for West Lebanon properties amid concerns about parking and permitting

July 22, 2026 | Lebanon, Grafton County, New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission weighs alternatives for West Lebanon properties amid concerns about parking and permitting
Members and staff told the commission that six of nine councilors have toured the West Lebanon Main Street properties and generally found them in poor condition.

Councilors said DEW Construction previously proposed a 28–30 unit affordable housing project with ground-floor retail, but some members and the West Lebanon Revitalization Committee are exploring alternatives that could include for-sale units or modular approaches to reduce construction costs. Councilors said they will continue to examine ownership options and whether owner-occupied units are feasible.

The discussion broadened to downtown economic drivers and barriers. Several members and residents complained about a perception — and sometimes reality — that Lebanon’s permitting process is difficult, discouraging small businesses from opening or expanding. City Manager Andrew Hosmer and Deputy City Manager David Brooks urged the commission to help by compiling examples of barriers so the council can consider policy or administrative responses. Hosmer emphasized staff’s role in shepherding applicants through state-controlled building and fire codes.

Parking constraints in West Lebanon were a recurring concern: members described narrow lots, limited street parking and the absence of centralized public parking, and floated a TIF-funded parking deck above the Mascoma lot to expand spaces. Members also discussed potential community events (a West Lebanon block party) and anchors that could draw shoppers — specialty shops, cafes or a food anchor — but stressed that a compelling ‘‘driver’’ will be needed to change development momentum.

No formal decisions were taken; commissioners agreed to continue exploring alternatives and may send feedback to the city council about permitting and other barriers identified by businesses and residents.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee