A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Board tables request to replace front door and Corinthian columns at 626 Nolan Street; staff to work with applicant on historic-appropriate options

May 22, 2026 | San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board tables request to replace front door and Corinthian columns at 626 Nolan Street; staff to work with applicant on historic-appropriate options
The Compliance and Technical Advisory Board tabled CTAP case 2020And8 for 626 Nolan Street after staff said the proposed replacements did not match the house’s architectural style and recommended retaining or repairing existing features in kind. Staff told the board that it does not recommend approval of either replacement item and encouraged working with the applicant on an alternate, historically appropriate design or returning the feature to an earlier condition if documentation exists.

“Staff does not recommend approval of Item 1 based on finding B... Staff does not recommend approval of item 2 based on finding C. Staff recommends the existing front door be maintained and repaired in kind as necessary,” a staff member said during the presentation. The staff presentation noted that administrative approval might be possible if the applicant provides historic photos or documentation showing an appropriate door or column profile.

Applicant Billy Telles, who identified himself at the hearing, said the current door is deteriorated and that the existing columns are plastic and nonoriginal: “My name is Billy Telles, and we're working at 626 Dolan Street... The door is falling apart.” A resident who said they purchased the house from a nonprofit described the 2005 alterations as nonhistoric and said earlier columns were Doric and smoother; the resident said they wanted the house returned to that earlier appearance.

Staff and commissioners discussed using survey photos and other archival images to establish an appropriate profile. Staff said it can look at survey photos and work with the applicant on a door and column profile; if staff cannot resolve the issue administratively, the applicant can return at the next hearing. Commissioners moved to table the item and direct staff to work with the applicant; the board set a return hearing date of June 26 to accommodate the 60-day review timeline if the applicant agrees to the continuance.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee