A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Resident urges more public review as Swenson expansion advances

June 14, 2026 | Hardwick, Caledonia County, Vermont


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Resident urges more public review as Swenson expansion advances
Carol Ray told the Woodbury Select Board she is "over the top about the Swenson expansion," and urged the board to provide additional public listening sessions before the zoning and district commission processes continue. She said she was overwhelmed by the project proposals and wanted clearer, in-person opportunities for community input.

The board responded that zoning decisions proceed through the zoning board and the district commission, and that being recorded as an "interested party" at the town level gives residents the right to appeal and to submit materials to the district commission. Chair (Select Board) and other members described the town and zoning roles as separate and said residents may participate directly in the upcoming hearings.

Ray raised health and environmental risks she associates with quarrying and on-site crushing equipment: airborne silica dust, chloride sprayed on roads that she fears will reach wetlands, and increased truck traffic. "I really think transparency should be your boat," she said, asking the board to add a discussion on the June 22 agenda or to organize additional forums so neighbors can ask questions.

Select Board members and road staff replied that crushers require specific air permits and that on-site stormwater controls (holding/collection pools) and dust-suppression systems are typical permit conditions. Select Board member (1) noted the company already has extraction permits and that some activities will be regulated by state agencies; he added the district commission will review whether mitigation measures are sufficient.

The board encouraged concerned residents to sign on as interested parties at the town level if they want formal standing to appeal, and to bring specific data or observations (for example, dust or water-quality readings) to the district commission to support claims about public-health impacts. No formal action was taken; the board and residents agreed to monitor the schedule for the next zoning/district hearings.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee