Researchers and materials experts urge data‑driven design and low‑carbon durable construction

Speakers stressed that accurate models and performance‑based design are essential to practical resilience. Kenneth, a research scientist at MIT, described a decade‑long campus effort that revealed a data gap: an initial model omitted private drainage and underestimated flood exposure. Refining the model led to design changes—moving mechanical systems out of basements, raising buildings and adding flood storage—that reduced risk without a clearly identifiable extra project cost.

"We need good data now. We need accurate models...and we need to work with our local agencies," Kenneth said, relating the campus example where later models altered project designs and avoided foreseeable damage.

Monet Kunz of the Rocky Mountain Institute argued that decarbonization and resilience can be mutually reinforcing in construction. She noted cement and concrete account for about 8% of global CO2 emissions and recommended performance‑based specifications and life‑cycle thinking that value long‑lasting, lower‑carbon materials.

Panelists recommended that local governments and developers use forward‑looking models (for example planning for 2070 flood conditions) and adopt procurement approaches that reward performance rather than prescribe materials, to both reduce future rebuilding and lower embodied carbon.