City staff told the Audit and Finance Committee on July 20 that a comprehensive $390 million bond package under review would be more appropriately timed for 2028, but they offered an interim funding option of roughly $150 million to address near-term capital needs.
"Professional staff continues to recommend that we not have a bond election in 2026, but that it be held in 2028," the committee chair summarized, citing staff analysis of the bond decision framework. Chief financial staff and the Capital Delivery Services director reported that the full $390 million scenario would not meet all financial-policy checks at this time.
Cost to taxpayers: staff estimated the $390 million proposal would create about $56.73 per year in debt service and roughly $24.40 per year in operations and maintenance for an average taxpayer, totaling about $81.13 annually.
Interim option and distribution: Ariana Castaneda, director of Capital Delivery Services, said staff is exploring a roughly $150 million interim package divided among three departments: about $75 million for parks, roughly $34 million for Transportation & Public Works, and $41'$43 million for watershed protection. Staff planned to present a more detailed breakdown during the next work session.
Council reaction: council members split on timing. Several members argued that parks infrastructure is overdue and urged a parks bond in November 2026, noting the last parks bond was several election cycles ago; others warned that a large November 2026 bond could be politically risky and preferred waiting to assemble a more compliant and equitable package in 2028.
Next steps: staff will provide a more detailed interim breakdown for the proposed $150 million option and return with additional analysis so the council can decide whether to move a targeted parks or interim package in 2026, or wait until 2028 for a larger, fully compliant bond package.