Torch Study Committee adopts governing-procedure language and forms data-focused subcommittees

The Torch Study Committee voted to adopt a governing-procedure document that includes a provision allowing minority opinions or recommendations to be captured in a single committee report.

Chair Eric introduced an updated draft that added a minority-report provision. Members debated whether to permit multiple minority opinions and whether the committee product should be a single compiled report with majority recommendations and any minority opinions included. After discussion, the committee adopted the proposed governing language by voice vote; Julie Watts seconded the motion and no members voiced opposition.

The group then turned to next steps and subcommittees. Members agreed to several task-focused working groups: one to compile claims-process maps and lifecycle data (led by Brian Baker, with Tina and Paul contributing); a second to gather other states’ approaches and best practices (Elizabeth Hanley and volunteers); and a third to identify measures to prevent harm and reduce public costs. Committee members asked for datasets — including ERP (Early Resolution Program) statistics, AG office resolution rates, and insurer reports — and tasked staff to request those materials (WSBA and other repositories were suggested as data sources).

Committee leadership also said it would extend the next meeting by an hour to allow time for more substantive presentations and data reviews. No additional votes on policy were taken at this meeting; the committee requested follow-up reports and data from presenters and state offices ahead of future meetings.