The San Diego City Council approved its consent agenda on Tuesday after public comment and detailed questioning about a multi-year contract extension for refuse containers and equipment.
During public comment and council questions, speakers criticized the scale of the RARIG contract (which the staff materials show had grown over several amendments to a total cited in public comments of roughly $106 million) and raised privacy concerns about an in-truck RFID/vision-camera pilot. Environmental Services staff told the council the pilot would cost about $30,000 initially and that a successful pilot could lead to a roughly $3 million purchase of hardware for trucks plus software costs for the remainder of the contract period; staff said the container rollout leveraged an existing cooperative procurement (Omnia) that included RFID technology.
Councilmember Von Wilpert and others pressed purchasing staff on whether the RFID hardware and software procurements had been competitively bid; Purchasing staff and Environmental Services explained the items are covered under a previously awarded cooperative procurement and that the container vendor provides RFID-enabled containers. Von Wilpert registered a no vote on the item and spoke against the procurement approach.
Separately, speakers and councilmembers raised concerns about repeated costly settlements paid out of the city’s public liability fund. The consent agenda included a $3.1 million settlement tied to a discrimination claim involving the San Diego Police Department; councilmembers discussed the cumulative settlement totals and encouraged continued work on accountability and cost-control measures.
The full consent agenda passed, with the clerk recording the action and noting recorded 'no' votes for specific items (Councilmember Von Wilpert voted no on items 52 and 112; Councilmember Foster voted no on item 52). Staff said funding for the container rollout and pilot is included in the water/trash cost-of-service models and that pilot purchases would follow testing.