Council defers adoption of proposed bylaws after questions about public‑comment language

The council started a detailed review of proposed bylaws but voted to defer final action to a later meeting to allow circulation of a redlined draft and written comments. Topics debated included whether to set a standing work‑session date (first Tuesday), how special and emergency meetings differ from work sessions, vice mayor term language, clerk appointment timing, and a rule that would limit multiple speakers from a group of 10 or more.

Free‑speech concern and tabling: One councilor said a provision that would let only one speaker represent a group of ten or more risked First Amendment problems; another member and staff recommended tabling the bylaws so proposed edits can be circulated in writing and considered at the next meeting. The motion to defer passed.

Next steps: Staff will produce a redline and circulate written comments for the council to review before the next meeting when the bylaws will be reconsidered.