A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Residents urge council to delay major South Ontario development items

July 07, 2026 | Ontario, San Bernardino County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Residents urge council to delay major South Ontario development items
Multiple residents asked the council to postpone consideration of major development-related consent items during public comment at the July 7 meeting, saying the public has not had adequate time or information to evaluate the cumulative impacts.

Chris Robles urged the council to table items 13 and 14 and said the combined consent items represented "millions of dollars in public commitments" including nearly $600,000 in consultant contracts for Grand Park and roughly $1.9 million for a sports complex. "Spending and policy decisions of this magnitude deserve individual staff presentations, public discussion and council deliberation not approval through just 1 vote on a consent calendar," Robles said.

Randy Beckendam and Karen May echoed the request to continue the items, arguing South Ontario land-use policies are flawed, that further discussion is needed about truck traffic and cumulative effects, and calling for a town hall to allow broader resident input. Beckendam said farmland can coexist with development through regenerative practices and warned that the current course could lead to political consequences. Karen May urged the council to "slow down, provide more public engagement and make sure these decisions truly reflect Ontario's long term interests before moving forward." She also directed residents to growontario.org for more information.

Council responded by moving forward with the consent calendar; the council approved the consent calendar by a recorded vote of 5-0. The council did not take separate action to table items 13 and 14 during the meeting.

The record also shows the City Manager circulated updated exhibits related to an assessment resolution (agenda item 4), with updated totals to be incorporated into the public record.

Next steps: Residents requested more public presentations and a town-hall style forum; no scheduling commitment for additional hearings on items 13 and 14 was recorded in the meeting minutes.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee