A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Actuarial report shows multimillion-dollar unfunded gap; trustees split over COLA, disability and in‑service changes

July 10, 2026 | Upper Darby, Delaware County, Pennsylvania


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Actuarial report shows multimillion-dollar unfunded gap; trustees split over COLA, disability and in‑service changes
The plan actuary presented the board with the Act 205 report filed with Harrisburg and told trustees the current minimum municipal obligation (MMO) for the pension plan is about $2,700,000 and the plan has roughly $51,200,000 in assets against about $61,500,000 in accrued liability, leaving an unfunded liability of about $10.3 million.

The actuary outlined three options the union side requested. He said a proposal to provide a 70 percent disability benefit would raise the MMO by roughly $91,000 a year. An in‑service change to a '55 and 25' distribution — which accelerates benefit payments compared with the plan's current assumptions — would increase the MMO by about $366,255. He also calculated a 3 percent cost‑of‑living adjustment delayed five years after retirement would add about $741,000 to the annual MMO.

“The estimated MMO for the current plan is about 2,700,000,” the actuary said in the presentation. He described the $741,000 figure as the annual increase in MMO for the COLA option and explained that part of the change to unfunded liability would be amortized over 10 years.

Trustees questioned the relative frequency of these features in comparable plans; the actuary said COLAs are less common due to cost, 70 percent disability provisions appear in some plans, and in‑service drops are not unusual for fire and police plans. Trustees also noted the plan already accounts for a 59-and-30 in‑service distribution baseline, meaning some proposed changes would accelerate benefit payments.

After discussion the union‑side trustees moved to approve the proposals; township‑side trustees opposed, producing a deadlock. Trustees agreed to work with the solicitor's office to resolve the impasse before formal adoption.

Next steps: the board agreed to consult with counsel and reconvene or otherwise report back with a recommendation for handling the deadlock.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee