A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

Council denies tenant’s appeal in 683 Kansas fire-certificate case, gives owner until Aug. 7 to comply

July 08, 2026 | City of Saint Paul, Washington County, Minnesota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council denies tenant’s appeal in 683 Kansas fire-certificate case, gives owner until Aug. 7 to comply
The Saint Paul City Council on July 9 denied an appeal by a tenant at 683 Kansas Avenue and approved the legislative hearing officer’s recommendation to give the property owner until Aug. 7 to correct identified fire- and safety-related violations.

Legislative hearing staff summarized the June 9 correction order and the history of inspections dating back to February, noting the report from supervisor Keith Demarest identified a dripping kitchen drain, an upstairs bathtub overflowing through the ceiling, a removed heat-deflector shield from a kitchen heater, and several missing smoke alarms. Staff recommended granting the owner a month to comply so repairs could be completed.

The tenant, who identified himself as Umbe McKenzie, testified that the unit suffered extensive damage and that he had experienced months without heat or hot water; McKenzie also alleged theft of materials and difficulties pursuing relief in court. McKenzie said, “I’m a keep fighting,” and asked the council for guidance on next steps.

Councilmembers discussed the record and noted that property owners are ultimately responsible for repairs. The Council President moved to deny the appeal and approve the recommendation to grant until Aug. 7 for compliance; the motion passed 7-0. Staff said inspectors will reinspect the unit on Aug. 7 and, if violations persist, may pursue further actions that can include condemnation or ordering the unit vacated.

The motion denies the tenant’s appeal of the correction order; it does not transfer responsibility from the owner to the city. Councilmembers told the appellant they and staff would follow up after the meeting to help identify additional avenues for assistance.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee