Owosso DDA tables proposed vacant commercial building registration after public concerns

The Owosso Main Street & Downtown Development Authority voted July 8 to table consideration of a proposed Vacant Commercial Building Registration and Inspection Program and asked the Economic Vitality Committee to return a recommendation in October.

The motion to table, moved by Commissioner Jon Moore and supported by Commissioner Colin McCallum, followed public comment and a staff presentation. Nathan Henne outlined the draft resolution and described a history of buildings in Owosso whose deferred maintenance led to irreversible deterioration, safety hazards to the public and adjacent structures, and municipal demolition costs. After discussion the board voted to defer further action until committees and property owners have been consulted; the motion passed with the members present voting in favor.

Public commenters objected to the proposal during the public-comment portion of the meeting. "I don’t think a Vacant Commercial Building Registration and Inspection Program aligns with the DDA’s mission," said Kori Shook, who added she believed only a couple of properties are problematic. Jim Woodworth said the program "will discourage downtown investment" and urged the City and DDA to "lead by example," citing missing bricks, weeds, litter and planters that need repair. Ann Eno warned that added fees could be passed to renters, and Shelly Ochodnicky said she was discouraged from buying downtown property because of costs and water rates. John Hankerd asked who would determine acceptable coverings for vacant storefront windows if the ordinance requires decorative treatments.

Board members stressed the need for more information and outreach. Commissioner Karen Parzych recommended contacting other communities to learn how comparable programs are executed; Mayor Robert J. Teich Jr. noted concern about the condition of 123 W. Exchange Street as an example of current vacancy issues. Commissioner Bill Gilbert suggested the Economic Vitality Committee study the resolution and return recommendations. The board directed that committee review and report back in October.

The decision to table did not adopt any changes to ordinances or impose fees; it paused formal action so the board and committees could gather more information and consult property owners. The board also recorded routine procedural approvals earlier in the meeting, including agenda and minutes approval, and adjourned at 8:37 a.m.

Next steps: the Economic Vitality Committee will review the proposed resolution and prepare a recommendation for the DDA’s October meeting.