A new, powerful Citizen Portal experience is ready. Switch now

SFUSD staff say 3rd‑grade literacy goals show mixed progress as board presses for implementation fidelity

March 24, 2026 | San Francisco Unified, School Districts, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

SFUSD staff say 3rd‑grade literacy goals show mixed progress as board presses for implementation fidelity
District research and instructional leaders presented the Goal 1 progress-monitoring report, which draws on STAR interim assessments, educator surveys and external learning walks.

Jess Reyes of Research, Planning and Assessment said the report combines winter STAR results, a December educator survey and January instructional observations to connect instructional practice to student outcomes. Moon Hak Kim and other staff said some subgroups (kindergarten and first grade cohorts) showed gains while indicators for 3rd-grade proficiency and certain comprehension domains lagged.

"We're starting from the far right side of the theory of action with the impact on student outcomes, and we will work backwards," Jess Reyes said as presenters laid out data and a multi-pronged plan to improve instructional coherence.

Commissioners asked detailed questions on the relationship between materials adoption and actual classroom practice. Staff acknowledged that while 67% of classrooms report using the adopted curriculum, measures of academic ownership (students explaining their thinking, text-dependent questioning, decodable-text practice) remained low and required deeper coaching and site-level enabling conditions. Staff described strengthened coaching expectations, revised coaching logs, citywide leader-coach meetings, and purchases of additional decodable texts to increase students’ independent practice.

The presentation concluded with staff commitments to focus on internalization protocols for leaders, clearer definitions of coaching cycles, and a plan to use implementation trackers to monitor school-level conditions. No board action was taken; commissioners indicated they expect follow‑up reports and clearer metrics of progress.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee