Board members discussed hiring Clear Career Professionals to screen and vet candidates for the EDC’s open executive director position, proposing a reduced scope that would cost roughly $7,000 because the EDC already has a pool of applicant resumes.
Proponents said the firm would whittle an existing applicant list to a semifinalist group, provide background checks and produce a leadership profile for the board. Supporters argued an outside firm would help ensure HR compliance and professionalize the search process.
But when the board moved to retain the firm, members could not reach the number of affirmative votes the board’s rules require for action in that setting. The presiding officer announced the motion did not pass for lack of sufficient 'yes' votes. Directors said they would either place the item back on a future agenda after clarifying the vote threshold and potential council approval for expenditures above the EDC’s internal spending limit or return with additional information for a full vote.
Why it matters: The city has budgeted for an executive director and board members stressed the importance of filling the role to implement the strategic plan. The failure to approve a search-firm contract delays an organized, outside-assisted search and leaves the board dependent on staff and volunteer time to process applications.
Next steps: Members asked staff to return with the firm’s detailed scope, the city’s required procurement steps for expenditures over the EDC’s threshold, and options for a recruitment timeline that would allow the board to hire once procedural questions are resolved.